On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 1:30 PM <na...@immibis.com> wrote: > On 9/11/24 18:37, Willy Manga wrote: > > > 2. Copy exactly the subject line of the relevant message I want to > > reply and if it doesn't yet contain a 'Re:' in front, I insert it. > > > > And that is exactly what I'm doing with this reply. > > [...] > > > FWIW this did appear as a new thread in my client (Thunderbird). > > Replying to the digest like this breaks the proper reply link in the > message headers, and relies on clients using heuristics like matching > the subject and quoted text, which not all clients will do. > > Isn't it better to *not* put the "Re: " in the subject line, so that the reply keeps the same threading as the original message?
Or am I just an outlier in doing it without the "Re: " addition in the subject line? Matt
