Colt is a good option if you’re seeking wavelengths. For transit we use a mix of the other carriers, pccw included but we go through the wholesale side and not hkt which is the domestic arm of pccw and they are ridiculously expensive.
> On Dec 17, 2021, at 13:13, Eric Dugas via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > > I am in no way an expert in APAC but all of the IP carriers I have in NA are > present in HK: Cogent, Tata, Telia, Zayo. > > My guess is a good portion of the interconnections with other IP carriers, > CDNs and such will be either in Singapore or Tokyo. > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:56 PM nanoguser99 via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> >> wrote: >> Nanog, >> >> Currently my organization uses PCCW which we pay through the nose for and >> I'm looking to cut them. This was put in place before me. I was informed >> that PCCW is "the carrier" in Hong Kong but based on my analysis I'm not >> sure that's the case. My analysis of carriers such as Lumen and Cogent put >> them on par with PCCW. Pings to random IPs in HK are reasonable fast on all >> of them, same with pings to cloud providers. Access to mainland is not a >> hard requirement but just to check they all had 300+ ms latency to known IPs >> in Shanghai and Tanjin. >> >> I know some regions such as Korea or Dubai are monopolized where the wrong >> carrier takes you on a far away path to get a few blocks down the street. >> >> I don't need anything special, just general DIA and good access to eyeballs >> and internet. I just wanted to see people's opinions here as APAC >> connectivity can be tricky. >> >> - Nanoguser99 >> >> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >>
