Another thing worth of consideration is that virtually any box with an OpenWRT image can support CLAT if it has enough resources.
Owen > On Aug 24, 2020, at 8:21 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > > You probably mean 464XLAT .... > > Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even better. > > If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new boxes > ... just something to think in the future about those vendors. > > I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some > customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been doing this for many customers. > Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 24/8/20 16:32, "NANOG en nombre de Roman Tatarnikov" > <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@nanog.org en nombre de > r.tatarni...@intlos.org> escribió: > > I've been looking into implementing 646XLAT, however I found the problem > ends up with clients' routers. > > When you give them Ethernet cable that has internet on it, whatever it > gets plugged into must support CLAT in order for 646XLAT to work. I was not > able to find any small devices that support it natively, at least according > to their description. The only way I found to enable CLAT support is to flash > those devices with OpenWRT, which is not really an option when you are giving > away those tiny boxes to residential clients when they sign up with you. > > So for now we're stuck with CGNAT. :( I do hope I'm wrong and you can tell > me which device works with 646XLAT out of the box. And hopefully it's > something TRENDnet's. > > -- > Roman V Tatarnikov > https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov > W: 310 929 2607 | C: 805 746 2886 > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > >
