Many vendors are running on top of OpenWRT or Linux, and both of them have CLAT 
support.

Unfortunately, I can't give names which aren't already published, such as 
Sagemcom, D-Link, NEC and Technicolor. Believe me there are others, you just 
need to ask them.

Mikrotik is the worst vendor for anything related to transition. They only run 
pure dual-stack, and even on that, they are really bad. They even use a broken 
naming convention against the standards. They use 6to4 instead of 6in4, which 
get a lot of folks confused ...

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 25/8/20 18:15, "NANOG en nombre de Mark Tinka" 
<[email protected] en nombre de 
[email protected]> escribió:



    On 24/Aug/20 17:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:

    > You probably mean 464XLAT ....
    >
    > Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even 
better.
    >
    > If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new 
boxes ... just something to think in the future about those vendors.
    >
    > I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some 
customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been doing this for many customers. 
Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features.

    If CLAT support were wide-spread, it would quickly accelerate the
    deployment of IPv6 in broadband applications.

    Not even Mikrotik are doing it, and they pretty much own the FTTH CPE
    market in many countries.

    If only CPE's could run Android, or Windows :-).

    Mark.



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



Reply via email to