On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:17 AM Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 24/Aug/20 17:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: > > > > > You probably mean 464XLAT .... > > > > > > Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even > better. > > > > > > If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new > boxes ... just something to think in the future about those vendors. > > > > > > I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some > customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been doing this for many customers. > Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features. > > > > If CLAT support were wide-spread, it would quickly accelerate the > > deployment of IPv6 in broadband applications. > > > > Not even Mikrotik are doing it, and they pretty much own the FTTH CPE > > market in many countries. > > > > If only CPE's could run Android, or Windows :-). > > > > Mark. Askey ships 464xlat boxes for T-Mobile in the USA, so they have the products and the knowledge to make it work https://www.askey.com.tw/index.html I am aware of other big CPE makers too, but this is the public one providing product today. Also, anything based on OpenWRT works... which is increasingly the base vendors build on. > >
