I must have been tired. I read it as do I go to NANOG meetings. Sorry for the 
confusion.

> On Aug 27, 2020, at 12:59 PM, surfer <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 4:22 PM, surfer <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/20 9:28 AM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>>>>>> They're the worst service company I have ever had the displeasure of 
>>>>>> dealing with, the arrogance and attitude of we are big, you are small we 
>>>>>> don't care about your customers was infuriating. Never have I seen a 
>>>>>> single call related to their opposition where as PSN accounted for about 
>>>>>> 10-20% of helpdesk calls. I don't understand why its seemingly 
>>>>>> impossible for them to implement ipv6 as almost everything I have 
>>>>>> deployed with CGN is dual stack V6.
>>>>> On 8/26/20 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>>>>> We'll have to be creative with how we pressure them into getting serious
>>>>>> about IPv6.
>>>>> On Aug 26, 2020, at 3:06 PM, surfer <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do those guys attend NANOG meetings?   >;-)   (evil smile)
>>> On 8/26/20 10:09 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:
>>>> I have/do. Do you have a point?
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I guess you're implying you work there.  Maybe someone will bake a cake 
>>>> for your company.
> On 8/26/20 6:59 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
>> I do not work at either NANOG or Sony. How would my response imply that? 
>> Again, what is your point?
>> 
>> I have attended a lot of NANOG meetings and CGM/IPv6 transition was a point 
>> of discussion many times, but as usual it was always in the ether. Few 
>> actually deployed examples and always worried about breaking the Internet. 
>> We broke it decades ago and now we are reaping the rewards.
>> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> :: I do not work at either NANOG or Sony. How would my response imply that? 
> Again, what is your point?
> 
> Because I said "Do those guys attend NANOG meetings?" and you said "I 
> have/do."  Seems pretty clear to me.
> 
> My point is other NANOG folks could speak to the Sony network engineers 
> directly and find out what Sony's plan is.
> 
> scott
> 

Reply via email to