How does 464XLAT solve the problem if you are out of IPv4 space?
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 3:23 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
> wrote:
>
> They know we are there ... so they don't come!
>
> By the way I missed this in the previous email: I heard (not sure how much
> true on that) that they are "forced" to avoid CGN because the way games are
> often programmed in PSP break them. So maybe will not be enough to sort out
> the problem with an OS and/or PSN change, all the affected games, will need
> to be adjusted.
>
> Maybe the only way to force this is to tell our customers (many ISPs in every
> country) "don't buy Sony PS, they are unable to support new technologies, so
> you games will be blocked by Sony". Of course, unless we all decide to use
> 464XLAT instead of CGN ... which resolves the problem.
>
> A massive campaing could work ...
>
>
> El 26/8/20 22:08, "NANOG en nombre de surfer"
> <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@nanog.org en nombre de
> sur...@mauigateway.com> escribió:
>
>
>
> On 8/26/20 9:28 AM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>> They're the worst service company I have ever had the displeasure of dealing
>> with, the arrogance and attitude of we are big, you are small we don't care
>> about your customers was infuriating. Never have I seen a single call
>> related to their opposition where as PSN accounted for about 10-20% of
>> helpdesk calls. I don't understand why its seemingly impossible for them to
>> implement ipv6 as almost everything I have deployed with CGN is dual stack
>> V6.
>
> On 8/26/20 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> We'll have to be creative with how we pressure them into getting serious
>> about IPv6.
>
>
> Do those guys attend NANOG meetings? >;-) (evil smile)
>
> scott
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>
>
>
