On 29/Jul/20 16:30, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > afaik, this is an implementation of draft-walton-bgp-hostname-capability. Nice. I'm curious to know if this is after-the-fact, as I can't think of a way that BGP would find hostnames to setup sessions with, outside of some kind of upper layer name resolution capability. The draft isn't clear on how this happens, if it is, indeed, before-the-fact. Mark.
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it... Alejandro Acosta
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Saku Ytti
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Douglas Fischer
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it... Simon Leinen
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop ... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 n... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with I... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Chriztoffer Hansen
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 n... Saku Ytti
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with I... Mark Tinka
- BGP unnumbered examples from data center netwo... Simon Leinen