On 29/Jul/20 15:51, Simon Leinen wrote: > > Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > sw-o(swp16) 4 65108 953559 938348 0 0 0 03w5d00h > 688 > sw-m(swp18) 4 65108 885442 938348 0 0 0 03w5d00h > 688 > s0001(swp1s0.3) 4 65300 748971 748977 0 0 0 03w5d00h > 1 > s0002(swp1s1.3) 4 65300 661787 661794 0 0 0 03w1d23h > 1 > s0003(swp1s2.3) 4 65300 748970 748977 0 0 0 03w5d00h > 1 > s0004(swp1s3.3) 4 65300 661868 661875 0 0 0 03w1d23h > 1 > s0005(swp2s0.3) 4 65300 748970 748976 0 0 0 03w5d00h > 1 > [...] > > Note the host names/interface names - this is how you generally refer to > neighbors, rather than using literal (IPv6) addresses. Are the names based on DNS look-ups, or is there some kind of protocol association between the device underlay and its hostname, as it pertains to neighbors? Mark.
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Saku Ytti
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop ... Vincent Bernat
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop ... Owen DeLong
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it... Alejandro Acosta
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Saku Ytti
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Douglas Fischer
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it... Simon Leinen
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Do... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop ... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 n... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with I... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Chriztoffer Hansen
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes wi... Mark Tinka
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 n... Saku Ytti
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with I... Mark Tinka
- BGP unnumbered examples from data center netwo... Simon Leinen