On 11/Jun/20 00:41, Job Snijders wrote: > > Back to basics: as Ytti suggested earlier in the thread, it might be more > sensible to generate your own default route based on a 'stable anchor prefix' > coming from the ISP rather than accepting the default your ISP originates > towards you. This, for me, makes a bit more sense. Especially when the number of customers asking for default far outweighs those that don't, for a large network where designing this can be quite tricky. Mark.
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chuck Anderson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Job Snijders
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Nick Hilliard
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Joe Greco