On 5/Jun/20 18:49, Saku Ytti wrote: > > The comparison isn't between full or default, the comparison is > between static default or dynamic default. Of course with any default > scenario there are more failure modes you cannot route around. But if > you need default, you should not want to use dynamic default. I've found this to be easier to do if your network is reasonably "centralized", i.e., there is one or two (or small handful) of "entry and exit" points. With a stretchy, relatively flat network that neither has a definite entry nor exit point, it's a bit difficult to decide which failure mode should take the default route away. Mark.
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chuck Anderson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Job Snijders
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tore Anderson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin