In a message written on Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:39:57PM -0800, Tony Hain wrote: > No, the decision was to not blindly import all the excess crap from IPv4. If > anyone has a reason to have a DHCPv6 option, all they need to do is specify > it. The fact that the *nog community stopped participating in the IETF has > resulted in the situation where functionality is missing, because nobody > stood up and did the work to make it happen.
The last time I "participated" a working group chair told me
"operators don't know what they are talking about" and went on to
say they should be ignored.
--
Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
pgpJJzA3yxE1T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
