On Wed, Feb 18, 2009, Tony Hain wrote: > No, the decision was to not blindly import all the excess crap from IPv4. If > anyone has a reason to have a DHCPv6 option, all they need to do is specify > it. The fact that the *nog community stopped participating in the IETF has > resulted in the situation where functionality is missing, because nobody > stood up and did the work to make it happen.
Please explain where you think "*nog" community is today representative at all of the wider scale IPv6 deployment issues across the world? I'm assuming IETF and ARIN/RIPE/APNIC/etc are busy talking to end-users rather than just ISPs about the issues facing IPv6 adoption. Am I mistaken or not? Adrian
