Leo Bicknell wrote: > ... > But, when DHCPv6 was developed the "great minds of the world" decided > less functionality was better. There /IS NO OPTION/ to send a default > route in DHCPv6, making DHCPv6 fully dependant on RA's being turned on! > So the IETF and other great minds have totally removed the capability > for operators to work around this problem.
No, the decision was to not blindly import all the excess crap from IPv4. If anyone has a reason to have a DHCPv6 option, all they need to do is specify it. The fact that the *nog community stopped participating in the IETF has resulted in the situation where functionality is missing, because nobody stood up and did the work to make it happen. Tony
