>> So we deploy v6 addresses to clients, and save the remaining v4 addresses for servers. Problem solved? >I have been suggesting that for a long time. > >However I am not suggesting IPv6-only to clients. See my other email on this >from a minute or so ago. > >The way I see things going in the medium term: >* IPv4 SP-NAT >* IPv6 native to clients
+1 Wait, can I vote more than once? If so, +(more). <<SNIP>>
