> I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on track. of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.
> with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining > these with NAT-PT could help with the transition cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient space to number their customer edge. randy
