> cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with > the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient > space to number their customer edge. > Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out > dual stacks to the CPE.
except that, if you do not have enough ipv4 pace to number your cpe perimeter, you can't do that. again, take a look at draft-ymbk-aplusp-02.txt randy
