On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 09:10:01AM +1100, raf wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:12:41PM +0100, Stefan Hagen > <sh+m...@ptrace.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > 550-5.7.26 This message does not have authentication > > > > information or fails to 550-5.7.26 pass authentication > > > > checks. To best protect our users from spam, the > > > > 550-5.7.26 message has been blocked. Please visit > > > > Authenticated in this context means, you don't have SPF / DKIM / > > DMARC set up. > > That's sad. I'm pretty sure that the absence of SPF/DKIM/DMARC was > never supposed to be interpreted as a failure of any of them. > Perhaps the sending domain does have SPF but it's not setup > correctly. It doesn't seem to (unixarea.de). > What is *really* sad is that most of the spam which gets through direct to this account of mine is things apparently from gmail addresses, pointing to ntlworld/somewhereelse.com addresses inviting me to login, and with DKIM apparently passing (the last couple I looked at were relaxed/relaxed).
ĸen -- The beauty of reading a page of de Selby is that it leads one inescapably to the conclusion that one is not, of all nincompoops, the greatest. -- du Garbandier
