On 21Nov2020 16:37, Kurt Hackenberg <k...@panix.com> wrote:
>On 2020-11-21 00:10, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>How about:
>>
>> The draft file is expected to contain just an RFC822 email:
>> headers and a body. Although it is not an mbox file, if an mbox "From
>> " pseudo-header is present, it will be silently discarded.
>
>I like this approach. However, please don't call it a "pseudo-header".
>That still sounds like it's kinda sorta part of RFC 822. It's not, at
>all. It's not even legal syntax for a header (because there's no ':').
>It usually called a "From " line or From_ line.
>
>'...if an mbox "From " line is present...'
I went with "pseudoheader" because people confused by this are confused
because they think it _is_ a header, after all in an mbox file it's
always the first thing.
I can see that that elevates its status.
This then?
The draft file is expected to contain just an RFC822 email:
headers and a body. Although it is not an mbox file, if an mbox "From
" line is present, it will be silently discarded.
I'll figure out how to do a *roff nonbreaking space; I used to know...
Thanks,
Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>
