* On 21 Sep 2015, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > > I still think some command or function to do this would help a lot. > > Wrapping all functions like this is…tedious to say the least. It also > > makes reading these things annoying since the meat of the binding is > > buried 65 characters into the line. > > Can a macro be executed by another macro? > Back in my troff days we used to write macros like > "save_a_group_of_settings" and "restore_saved_settings". > > After the housekeeping macro calls appeared at the start > and end of several other definitions, the mind learns to > ignore them when considering the logic of the macro later.
Yes. I do that pretty often and agree it's appropriate here. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
