Mutt asks me this after any pipe-message command. I can see how it is necessary for commands that produce output; otherwise I wouldn't get a chance to see the output. But what about commands that produce nothing on stdout? Some non-interactive commands may save their output in a file, so their stdout is empty. And then there are commands with an interactive UI loop of their own, like lynx. For both of these types the extra prompt to close the output is useless and annoying. Can I get rid of it?
-- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
