* Ian Zimmerman on Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 21:36:24 -0700 > Mutt asks me this after any pipe-message command. I can see how it is > necessary for commands that produce output; otherwise I wouldn't get a > chance to see the output. But what about commands that produce nothing > on stdout? Some non-interactive commands may save their output in a > file, so their stdout is empty. And then there are commands with an > interactive UI loop of their own, like lynx. For both of these types > the extra prompt to close the output is useless and annoying. Can I get > rid of it?
set wait_key=no -- theatre - books - texts - movies Black Trash Productions at home: http://www.blacktrash.org Black Trash Productions on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/blacktrashproductions
