* Ben Fitzgerald <benfi...@gmail.com> [2015-06-26 17:16:20]:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:28:45PM +0200, Andrzej Popielewicz wrote:
> > * Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> [2015-06-25 17:07:37]:
> > 
> 
> > I have just tested. It works.
> > In order to begin the game You have to switch on two-stage verification,
> > being in Your Gmail account. After verification using code snet to You via 
> > SMS
> > You are able to set application passwords. I have set three passwords,
> > for Thunderbird, for my old Galaxy phone and for mutt of course.
> > Setting the password for Galaxy Tab was not needed, during login 
> > verification code was sent via SMS , it means orginal gmail password is 
> > preserved. 
> > And all three passwords work. This operation has to be done only once.
> > In the case of mutt You simply modify imap_pass.
> > So now we can say mutt is secure in the sense of google two-stage 
> > verfication.
> > I like it.
> 
> Hi Andrzej
> 
> yes just followed your instructions and I'm happily writing this from
> mutt.
> 
> As you say you just need to update imap_pass, setting smtp_pass (at
> least for me) was not required.
> 
> What a great response from this mailing list.
> 
> Ben.

Well, I did not test sending yesterday yet.
I did it today. The result is , that one has to use application password
also for smtp folder too.
In fact I do not use imap_pass. Because I have many imap accounts I have
to use folder hooks, and I set password using the syntax user:pass@host.
If You use single variable for imap and smtp pass You have to modify
only in once place.
In any case sending works.

On the other hand one could ask why not add to mutt the capability of
sending verification code, obtained via SMS. I think it is the question
rather to implementers of sasl library.

Andrzej

Reply via email to