Two things happened about the same time -- I upgraded mutt on my linux system, 
and I upgraded my smart phone.  The phone matters because I suddenly had enough 
memory for various apps which had long since been squeezed out of the old 
phone, including K-9 email.

Ever since, the linux mutt has aperiodically closed the mailbox with a message 
which disappears too quickly for me to see, and usually happens when I am not 
looking at email anyway.  This happens several times a day.  It sometimes, but 
not even a majority of the time, seems to be vaguely related to having checked 
email on the phone recently, for various paranoia-induced definitions of 
'recently'.  There are also times when I check email on the phone and linux 
mutt soldiers on with no problem.  But a few times, I have been curious enough 
about this relationship to stop looking at email on the phone, and linux mutt 
seems to not close its mailbox as often.

On the other hand, I have always been able to open a new screen session and 
start a new mutt when the main one is in the middle of composing email, and 
never had any problems with closing the mailbox.

I realize this is all too vague to be very useful.  But I wonder if K-9 does 
anything different that would sufficiently upset linux mutt to confuse it and 
close the mailbox?  The main difference I see is that K-9 sets up some kind of 
push notification with the server and knows of new email instantly rather than 
only checking every minute as linux mutt does.


Speaking of which, is there any way to get mutt to handle push notices from the 
mail server?  I suspect not, since mutt is a mailbox reader, not an smtp client 
as such.


Linux is Ubuntu 13.04, and its mutt is 1.5.21.  Don't know what the mail server 
is, but it serves up IMAP.

-- 
            ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
     Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / fe...@crowfix.com
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o

Reply via email to