Incoming from rj: > On Tue 16 at 12:15 PM -0700, "Kevin J. McCarthy" <ke...@8t8.us> wrote: > > > rj wrote: > > > macro index,pager p "<enter-command>set editor='vim +10'<enter><reply>" > > > "list-reply with quoting" > > > macro index,pager _R "<enter-command>set editor='vim +10'<enter><reply>" > > > "list-reply without quoting" > > > > Did you intend to use <list-reply> instead of <reply> for the two macros > > Yes! I did, thank you. But the second one is identical to the first. > I tried the following for "reply without quoting," and it works, but > after using it, if I want to reply *with* quoting, using "r", I get > no-quoting again, so this can't be right: > > macro index,pager R "<enter-command>set > include='no'<enter><enter-command>set editor='vim +10'<enter><reply>" > "reply without quoting"
Forgive me if I'm doing a "Department of Redundancy Department" thing.
Why are you doing this? In mutt, I hit "r", and emacs fires up with
the contents of the email I'm replying to. What are you doing that
improves or differs from that, and why are you needing to stuff a
macro to do it?
I'm just trying to understand the situation, and I'm not seeing why
you're going to such lengths for something that I think is already
there. :-|
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|:& };:
- -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
