* Alexander Dahl <p...@lespocky.de> [03-08-13 12:14]: > Hei hei, > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 03:59:24PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > Then there is *little* we disagree with in this scope. I am *against* > > "Reply-To:" mudging by list software and believe it should *only* be > > employed by a poster wishing replies to his posts to be rec'd by a > > different account such as posting from work and wanting receipt at home. > > And is mostly a crutch for unknowning/unable individuals to control their > > email environment and probably do not even know about "Reply-To:". > > If your user interface offers you reply and reply-to-all/reply-to-list > (good ones attach the *right* thing of the latter to the button if > there's one) then you do not need to know about what happens in the > background or what e-mail headers are, you just hit reply if you want > to reply in private and the other button if you want to reply to all > aka the list. This is simple and intuitive user interface and that's > why I consider a mailing list setting or changing reply to to be > broken.
I know not about "button[s]" as I work with text from the keyboard. But I believe we are saying/mean the same thing, mailing list software should not insert or alter Reply-To: header! -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
