* Erik Christiansen <dva...@internode.on.net> [02-28-13 02:44]: > On 27.02.13 15:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > I am *against* "Reply-To:" mudging by list software and believe it > > should *only* be employed by a poster wishing replies to his posts to > > be rec'd by a different account such as posting from work and wanting > > receipt at home. > > Hmmm, I've tried using "Reply-To:" to point back to the list, in the > hope that it'd discourage those pesky additional "courtesy replies". > It's rarely had any effect, but wouldn't it be wonderful if most MUAs > would respect it?
It may not, quite possibly not, be the mua. Mutt can be set to honor "Reply-To:", or not, but it is still possilbe to put any addr in the "To:" field that doesn't deviate from spec, or that does if you know how. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
