also sprach David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-mutt-us...@weller-fahy.com> [2009.11.28.2236 +0100]: > * Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> [2009-11-27 21:07 -0500]: > > If you call check-traditional-pgp on this message, is this text > > lost? It is for me and I would call it a bug. It might also be > > some subtle difference between our configurations, gpg versions, > > etc. > > FWIW I copied your message into ~/test, and then opened it using > the latest tip, and the following command-line. > > #v+ > mutt -n -F usr/share/doc/mutt/samples/gpg.rc -f ~/test > #v- > > I then entered ':exec check-traditional-pgp' in mutt, and viewed > the message. The text preceding the digitally signed portion of > the message was still visible.
If I do the same with mutt from Debian sid (1.5.20 (2009-06-14)), then I definitely do not see the unsigned portions. This *could* be due to gnupg. Do you see the unsigned portions of the text if you run gpg < ~/test ? > I seem to recall this being brought up previously on the mailing > list, but can't find any reference (which may mean it is all in my > head). I'll keep searching, but haven't found anything about this > particular problem yet. I could not find anything prior to opening this thread. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "however jewel-like the good will may be in its own right, there is a morally significant difference between rescuing someone from a burning building and dropping him from a twelfth-storey window while trying to rescue him." -- thomas nagel spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
