I sometimes see TOFU on lists where the sender is replying to a
message that was signed using traditional (inline) PGP.  Their message
does not show up once check-traditional-pgp is called.  Only the
original text from the quoted PGP signed section is displayed.  I
don't think mutt has always behaved this way, but it happens somewhat
infrequently, so I could just not remember it.

If you call check-traditional-pgp on this message, is this text lost?
It is for me and I would call it a bug.  It might also be some subtle
difference between our configurations, gpg versions, etc.

I don't know how much I care about it, as I just don't care much
about inline PGP messages.  But it is a bit curious.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Derek Martin wrote:
> I have pgp_auto_decode set, and additionally I unset it and manually
> executed check-traditional-pgp, and I saw the above text in all cases.
> So unless I misunderstood you, it seems my Mutt behaves differently
> from yours...

Hmmm.  I can reproduce it using mutt -n -F /dev/null.  It also doesn't seem to
matter whether I use the gpgme backend or the classic backend.

> But besides that, check-traditional-pgp is not intended to work with
> MIME messages...

I've seen this problem when there is no PGP-MIME involved.  Or did you mean any
MIME?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQFDBAEBCAAtBQJLEI+SJhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBvYm94LmNvbS9+dG16L3BncC90
bXouYXNjAAoJEEMlk4u+rwzjtNAIAKAMA3gookXY/N8HY9dgiLhR0+Ts2QvjmbAv
kszePAwBy8KhXTt88MGPEE4Tz0QnUADDTtZBHxhVy29PPE+S9RITPuULgxoNvmcJ
pJSkpGgZivlmm8vs90PBL68YKwH1Lv97XFSQhiAGWHtWBFR4LtB7gAvB+em4oeVB
6hKDo22O2A/5d/oU3L6SpOK/PbyRas4JDbSsV3Kk2lPYMyav+ATH+i9atCIjwi79
S4um0bxLsaTOhuJcjNpgosRpSpTunisYudF84bVmWHpr2NV+TLxeIkL2crai9aYc
XmwnyK9AJljSzoPDlwufqvZRMxVsXs40a2X9EHEZ/uxNJ26XQ3E=
=pxX0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hard work never killed anybody, but it is illegal in some places.
    -- Demotivators (www.despair.com)

Reply via email to