On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: > > I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I > routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular > posters I know are past redemption.. > > I don't see why I should go to the trouble of having to delete their > contributions. > > I don't have much time, so I ignore them. > > I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts > on top of stuff I intially couldn't be bothered to delete and not take > into account whatever garbage I didn't have the time & patience to get > rid of.
Say, I have many mailboxes that have many new messages, but now I have no so much time to see all of them, so I quickly enter mailboxes one by one, then just pick the message I'm got most of interested, leave the remaining messges for viewing them when I have time. Serveral hours later, I have time, I want to see the new messages that I haven't seen last time, but now, all mailboxes haven't any flags, so I have to go through all of them to see if there are new message in them or not. -- Hi, Wu, Yue
