On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: > > I totally disagree. > > I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I > routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular > posters I know are past redemption.. > > I don't see why I should go to the trouble of having to delete their > contributions. > > I don't have much time, so I ignore them. > > I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts > on top of stuff I intially couldn't be bothered to delete and not take > into account whatever garbage I didn't have the time & patience to get > rid of. > > Nothing personal, I assure you.
Then an option should be made to fit different user's taste I think, because from your view, 'mark_old' no need to be exist too. -- Hi, Wu, Yue
