Hi, * Jussi Ekholm [05/31/02 12:33:27 CEST] wrote: > Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/28/02 04:41:37 CEST] wrote: > >> In .muttrc I have: "mailboxes +IN-foobarA +IN-foobarB" > >> and also: "mbox-hook =IN-foorbarA =foobarA" etc.
> > You can use backticks to configure mutt by commands. Given > > that, use something like: > > mailboxes `ls -d ~/.mutt/IN.*` > This is probably a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway because it > has been bothering me since I first subscribed to mutt-user. ;-) Go ahead... > What's the thing with mailboxes with filename starting with IN (whoa, > three "with"'s in a row, $$ JACKPOT $$!)? Is it some sort of standard > for some mailbox format or what? I'd really want to know, so bear with > me... I've lots of files in ~/.mutt. So naming boxes where procmail sorts mail in like 'IN.localpart_of_listaddress' makes it easy to distinguish. Also, It makes it a lot easier to set a the appropriate value for $mask so that only INboxes are displayed. And as a side note: I do not name my files like that, that's the job of my cleanup shell script (which catches names of subscribed lists from ~/.procmailrc and creates all the setup for mutt). Cheers, Rocco
