* Steve Talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 20:35]: > One suggestion I could see for improvement would be to > prompt for a filter program (instead of an alternate editor) > and then replace the message with the STDOUT of the filter.
jeez - what else does mutt have to get for this? if you want editing, filtering, etc in the same program then why don't you switch to emacs? > That way simple things like: > sed 's/\<re:/Re:/i' set reply_regexp="^((aw|antw.?|antwort|re|r e|r?f|si|sv):[ \t]*)*" > or "grep -v '^X-Priority'" would work. .. which you can use via a subshell. > The prompt for <filter-message> would be something like > Filter command: > Anyone (dis)agree? yes. me disagree. you can put all this functionality into your script. Sven
