* On 2002.03.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Phil Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-19 21:41 +0000]: > > I believe the problem is that mutt shouldn't even be trying to verify the > signature since there isn't one. I'd say that the message about the > signature not being verified should only appear if there is a signature > but it's invalid.
But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees an encrypted message, it cannot know whether the message also is signed. Setting $pgp_good_signature allows mutt to detect good signatures on data. However, since pgp/gpg cannot determine signature validity on unencrypted data, mutt warns you that the signature cannot be verified. This is true, by specification. -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
