* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Jerome -- > > ...and then Jerome De Greef said... > % > % I think I have the solution: > > Yay! > > > % > % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > > Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need > > ..* > > in your patterns instead of just > > .* > > 'cuz the former is "one character plus zero or more characters" while the > latter still accepts none. > > Perhaps it works simply because there is a To: header to check versus one > being absent; in that case, you can probably leave off the asterisk.
It works as is. But you're right, I thought .* was doing what ..* does. I'm not that good with regular expressions. BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? Jerome -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
