* On 2002.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote: > > > > Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize > > mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't > > specified by a reasonably standard standard. There are many ways > > to identify a mailing list. Mutt shouldn't need to be trained and > > maintained to know the latest ones. > > Ok, but how about the two that are RFCs?
Are you asking me, or speaking rhetorically? I'd deal with them the same way. If you're really trying to make a request of the development team, you should write to mutt-dev or use the provided program for making feature requests. All you're doing here is griping. If you're lucky, someone will take up your cause and create a patch, but if you honestly want to treat this as a formal feature request, you're better off making a formal feature request. See mutt(1) or flea(1). -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
