* On 2002.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
*       "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
> > 
> > Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
> > mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
> > specified by a reasonably standard standard. There are many ways
> > to identify a mailing list. Mutt shouldn't need to be trained and
> > maintained to know the latest ones.
> 
> Ok, but how about the two that are RFCs?

Are you asking me, or speaking rhetorically?

I'd deal with them the same way. If you're really trying to make a
request of the development team, you should write to mutt-dev or use
the provided program for making feature requests. All you're doing here
is griping. If you're lucky, someone will take up your cause and create
a patch, but if you honestly want to treat this as a formal feature
request, you're better off making a formal feature request. See mutt(1)
or flea(1).

-- 
 -D.    [EMAIL PROTECTED]        NSIT    University of Chicago

Reply via email to