Jeremy -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % % On Jan 09, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % > > All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am % > > concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for % > > the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditional is set. % > > % > > Time for a change of policy (or religion), right? % > % > That would certainly seem about right. I think it's a sad state of % > affairs that needs remedying pronto. % % So have any of you guys filed this as an actual bug against mutt yet? % Talking about it in the mailing lists is a lot less guaranteed to be seen, % to say the least.
No, we leave that up to people who actually want to talk to users of other mail programs ;-) Or at least I figured that "someone else would do it", particularly since I didn't start the thread. Someone ought to raise a hand and go ahead... :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22698/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
