-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:56:53PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
>
> I think this issue is a strong point in favour of ME's suggestion:
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:40:53AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > At this point I have to agree with this sentiment. After six years, we are
> > really no furthur to the point of OpenPGP/MIME acceptance. I've personally
> > taken to just using a macro in VIM to invoke gpg messages because I have
> > to deal with a large number of Outlook users. I endorse changing
> > pgp_create_traditional such that for text/plain messages it doesn't alter
> > the content-type.
>
> All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am
> concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for
> the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditional is set.
>
> Time for a change of policy (or religion), right?
I really hope this happens. The application/pgp MIME type is ok
but it's ahead of it's time. I too use a macro in Vim to handle GPG. It
would be great if Mutt itself would use text/plain.
- --
John Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome!
http://www.jpunix.com
PGP/GPG key 164BDBAE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8PD6Q7YSEAxZL264RAvxrAKD1TX83ayKe+0ADISzBlWYqTqmqTACeMbHG
XXQ/GrI53nFlz7YAssDifj8=
=q4pG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
