On Jan 09, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > All PGP users I know either use Pine or Outlook, so as far as I am > > concerned, (unpatched) Mutt's PGP support is currently only usable for > > the Mutt mailing lists -- no matter how pgp_create_traditional is set. > > > > Time for a change of policy (or religion), right? > > That would certainly seem about right. I think it's a sad state of > affairs that needs remedying pronto.
So have any of you guys filed this as an actual bug against mutt yet? Talking about it in the mailing lists is a lot less guaranteed to be seen, to say the least.
msg22693/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
