Michael, et al --

...and then Michael Elkins said...
% 
% On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:50:03PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
% > It kind of depends.  Personally, I prefer setting pgp_replyencrypt 
...
% > any way).  So, from my side there's absolutely no objection against 
% > changing this default, except that I'm always reluctant to break 
% > user expectations.
...
% 
% What about changing the default value to ask-yes as a step in the "right"
% direction?  We can suggest what would be a good thing to do, but give the
% option for the user to ignore it.

I think this is a pretty good way to go.  Macros might break, but nobody
will start sending encrypted mail without realizing it (and perhaps being
unable to read the local copy, having not set an encrypt_to value), and
it's a good start.


:-D
-- 
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!

Attachment: msg21277/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to