Josh Huber wrote: > Will Yardley writes: > > Er, a few points: > > 1) to have qmail generate the Mail-Followup-To header automatically, > you must have a list of mailing lists for it to use, so unless you > add addresses to this list, the header won't get generated.
true, however if your admin were to add this list to the server (say for internal lists, or common lists) then you would have no way to change this (assuming you do not have root access on the machine). if it's your own machine and your own installation of qmail then no problem. > 2) Having a Reply-To and a Mail-Followup-To header at the same time is > fine. yes, but as mentioned below, mutt appears to ignore Reply-To even on reply if MFT is set. maybe i'm wrong, but that's what i remember happening. > 3) An MUA that honors the MFT header will use it for *followups* only > -- replies should go to the address specified in the Reply-To > header. well mutt's default implementation (at least) appears to follow MFT even with 'reply' or 'group-reply' - am i wrong? this is usually desirable, but has caused me some confusion in the past. > Definately. On lists that are technical and 90% use mutt it is nice. > What would be really nice is if MS OE supported these kinds of things. > Hah, right...how many years until they will? ;) haha well i am not holding my breath.... -- William Yardley System Administrator, Newdream Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
