* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-03 00:24]: > > > Hm, thread-wise is conciderably more expensive - date-wise involves > > just scanning the maildir, grabbing all the time()'s, sorting them > > and cutting off the top 1 week. > > I know, but I really don't want to break threads. I also forgot to > mention that I would mails a month old.
Breaking old threads isn't really a problem for me. Not as if they're going to be looked at much. > > Could do with libmutt and Mail::Mutt :) > > Huh? What's that? couldn't find anything on CPAN. A fictional interface to a shared library version of Mutt providing mailbox functionality, threading etc. Although personally I'd want a Ruby module :) -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
