Matthias --
...and then Matthias LOITSCH said...
% I'm sure that everybody here knows the problem that some email programs
% don't know how to reply correctly to a mail... So the threads are
% interrupted or shown something like this:
% '*>
Oh, yeah :-)
%
% so i looked in the header of those emails, and found that the emails
% which aren't recognized as an reply don't have the In-Reply-To and
% the References field. Ok, there is nothing to do.
Well, you could use Cedric's edit_threads patch and link them into the
threads wherever you wish, for one.
%
% but in some mails, there *is* the References field (but not the
% In-Reply-To) and mutt does *not* recognize it...
% is the References field not a kind of In-Reply-To ?
% : if not : what is the difference.
% : if yes : why does mutt not see it as an reply, and can i change
% someting in the .muttrc to let mutt recognize it?
Are you sure that mutt doesn't recognize it? If the References: field
contains only Message-IDs from messages not in your mailbox, then mutt
will have nothing to which to refer and thus be unable to thread that
message. Same goes for I-R-T: headers; if they don't point to something
that mutt has, then they're pretty useless.
%
%
% thanks.
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
PGP signature
