On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Tim Whitehead wrote: > more flexibility (hence configurability) besides the fact that it claims that it > "makes sendmail obsolete" (http://www.qmail.org). The only sticking point is djb's licensing. He purposely makes it obtuse and purposely does not license it to the norms. http://faq.mrball.net/#djb As well, it depends if you like putting everything in /var/qmail. -- Blue skies... Todd | Get a bigger hammer! | Sometimes you get what you want. | | http://www.mrball.net | Sometimes you get experience. | | http://faq.mrball.net | --unknown origin |
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Legant
- Re: Multiple delete Phil Sexton
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Whitehead
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Igor Pruchanskiy
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Myrddin
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Legant
- Re: smtp server config? CB
- Re: smtp server config? CB
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Igor Pruchanskiy
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Raghavendra Bhat
- Re: smtp server config? Ailbhe Leamy