At 08:03 -0500 26 Mar 2001, Adam Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I *am* using courier, and am quite aware of the author's, uh,
> personality. (-: But since it didn't work on the fcc, I would assume
> something else is culprit?

Well, then it appears that you have a problem in addition to courier.
But from your earlier message it does look like courier is causing
additional corruption, making diagnosis harder.  You may want to try
attaching a gzipped copy (to prevent courier from messing with it) of a
signed message, that may help to give a better idea of what's going
wrong.

> I'm using 1.3.15, should I still apply this patch?

Yes, this patch hasn't yet been integrated.  I suspect it was decided
that courier is too broken to accomodate.

> Also, how come incoming pgp/signed do not get munged?

No idea.  I have no experience with courier (and I intend to keep it
that way), the patch was written based on a suggestion from the author
of courier the last time this type of problem came up.

-- 
Aaron Schrab     [EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/
 The program isn't debugged until the last user is dead.

PGP signature

Reply via email to