JT Williams proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> > -: set envelope_from
> > Ok, that did the trick. Thanks!
> Well, maybe I spoke too soon.
> now recognizing me, but our SysAdmin tells me there are still
> problems (see his explanation below). Is this really a problem?
> I'd like to keep using mutt/IMAP if I could.... TIA/jtw
This (using normal sendmail channels) is not a problem at all ... as long as
your localhost masquerades as darwin.sfbr.org ;)
Check your mail via imap, and send mail via localhost's sendmail. See
http://www.sendmail.org and rtfm the faq there about rewriting headers and
masquerading. Or smarthost through sfbr.org's mailserver (by setting the DS
flag in your sendmail.cf)
> MUTT seems to use normal sendmail channels to send messages rather
> than connecting directly to the IMAP server. We run in a full IMAP
> environment (/var/mail is not mounted to client machines and clients
> do not run sendmail daemon).
Oh, so your clients dont run sendmail? Then, just compile something like
masqmail / nullmailer to relay everything to your smarthost for further
delivery.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
unfair competition, n.:
Selling cheaper than we do.
