Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 21 Sep 2000:
> The set of known lists (lists) is _always_ a subset of the set of
> subscribed lists (subscribe).
Umm, the other way around I believe. Or s/subset/superset/.
> Known lists are handled properly by list-reply, subscribed lists
> lead to the generation of mail-followup-to headers.
I thought both subscribed and unsubscribed (known but not subscribed)
lists get a MFT, the difference is in the contents..? Whether your own
address gets added to the header, or not. At least, I can give an
argument why the behaviour should be this. :-)
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Ten years since I went out of my mind; I won't go back.
