On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > > verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
............ deletia ..........
> > >
> > > But the above mentioned error shows up in the status area at the
> > > bottom of the mutt screen.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> >
> > It means that there is nothing in that PGP signature (more correct PGP
> > certificate) that makes sure that the certificate belongs to the
> > person who is named in that certificate. ...
> > [Stuff about certificates snipped.]
>
> I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
> it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
> EXACT SAME MESSAGE after upgrading from Mutt 1.2.x to Mutt 1.3.7 ...
> nothing in the PGP config had been changed.
>
> Guess some bug got introduced in the 1.3.x series?
>
Ah, I'm running 1.2.5
--
Rudi van Houten Department of Mathematics Utrecht University
Budapestlaan 6 - 3584 CD - Utrecht - Netherlands
:-) Fantasy is given mankind to make amends for what he is not,
and a sense of humour as consolation for what he is.
