On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 02:13:44AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 09 Aug 2000:
> > 1) Can this be disabled?
>
> Not that I know of, I took a quick glance at the manual and couldn't
> find it.
Ok, so it's not just me :-)
> > I Email an announce list, which has an explicit reply-to to a discussion
> > list.
>
> Yet another proof that Reply-To shouldn't be used for redirecting list
> mail traffic. :-) Even if this is a bit beside the point...
I agree that Mail-Followup-To is better, but
1) mailman doesn't let me set that for a list to redirect to another one
2) Too many MUAs ignore it
> You could supply a proper Mail-Followup-To header (eg. with send-hook
> and my_hdr) and then both L (list-reply) and g (group-reply) ought to
Yeah, I can fix it for myself as a users, but not for other people who don't
use mutt.
> An alternative is to use a From address for posting to that list which
> isn't covered by your $alternates setting.
:-)
> Hope this helps,
Thanks.
> PS "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ???
Yeah, it's an old mail-news gateway, I didn't remember if the mutt-users
list would let me post with an address that isn't subscribed (I subscribe
one address per list I read, but I use a different address to post). Long
story and a bit broken, never mind :-)
Marc
--
Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ (friendly to non IE browsers)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key and other contact information
