On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 03:40:27PM +0530 or thereabouts, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Ditto with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and such. But why do you want to > fragment the list? > > A better way is to introduce list topics, and have people subscribed only > to specific topics. Listserv supports it (and majordomo 2 as well, iirc) > I'm not familiar with list topics. Sounds the same to me. Care to elaborate?
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Peter Palfrader
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (FAQ) Kai Blin
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Charles Curley
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... David T-G
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... David T-G
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Rino Mardo
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Rino Mardo
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... rex
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Curt Zirzow
- a Mutt FAQ? (was "Re: those users" (was &... Eugene Lee
- Re: a Mutt FAQ? (was "Re: those users" (w... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: a Mutt FAQ? (was "Re: those users" (w... Gary Johnson
- Re: a Mutt FAQ? (was "Re: those users" (w... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... Lars Hecking